Chapter 1 ยท Number foundations review

Equivalent Fractions and Lowest Terms

See why one amount can have many fraction names. Learn to write equivalent fractions and to write a fraction in lowest terms.

15 min read

One amount of a whole can have more than one fraction name. In this lesson you will see why, and you will learn to choose the simplest name.

A fraction such as 34\frac{3}{4} describes part of a whole, which is the complete thing you are measuring or sharing. The bottom number, the denominator, tells you how many equal parts make up the whole. The top number, the numerator, tells you how many of those parts you count. The parts must all be equal. In this lesson every numerator and denominator is a counting number: 1,2,31, 2, 3 and so on.

The bar below shows one whole with 44 equal parts. Shading covers 33 of them, so the shaded amount is 34\frac{3}{4} of the bar.

One whole with 44 equal parts and 33 of them shaded: 34\frac{3}{4} of the bar.

Now picture the same bar with each of its 44 parts cut into 22 equal pieces. You add nothing and remove nothing, so the whole is the same and the shaded amount is the same. Only the way you count it changes.

  • The whole now has 4ร—2=84 \times 2 = 8 equal parts.
  • The 33 shaded parts have become 3ร—2=63 \times 2 = 6 shaded parts.

The bar below shows the result: shading covers 66 of the 88 equal parts, so the shaded amount is 68\frac{6}{8} of the bar. Both bars stand for the same whole. Each fourth (one of the 44 equal parts) in the first bar matches 22 eighths (two of the 88 equal parts) in the second. That is why 34\frac{3}{4} and 68\frac{6}{8} name the same amount of this whole.

The same whole with 88 equal parts and 66 of them shaded: 68\frac{6}{8} of the bar.

Key concept

Equivalent fractions name the same amount

Equivalent fractions are fractions that name the same amount of the same whole, with the whole split into equal parts each time.

Let aa be a numerator, bb its denominator and nn any counting number. Multiplying both aa and bb by nn gives an equivalent fraction, because you cut each of the bb equal parts into nn smaller equal parts. The whole then has bร—nb \times n parts and you count aร—na \times n of them, so the amount does not change. With the bars, 34=3ร—24ร—2=68\frac{3}{4} = \frac{3 \times 2}{4 \times 2} = \frac{6}{8}.

You may also divide both numbers by the same counting number, as long as it divides both exactly, with no remainder: that is the same rule read from right to left. Zero is not allowed for nn: you cannot cut a whole into 00 parts.

ab=aร—nbร—nforย countingย numbersย a,b,n\frac{a}{b} = \frac{a \times n}{b \times n} \quad \text{for counting numbers } a, b, n

Worked example

Write an equivalent fraction

Write a fraction that is equivalent to 25\frac{2}{5} and has a denominator of 2020. Both fractions describe the same whole.

  1. Find the counting number that turns the denominator 5 into 20. It is 4, because 5 times 4 is 20. So you cut each of the 5 equal parts of the whole into 4 smaller equal parts.

    5ร—4=205 \times 4 = 20
  2. Multiply the numerator by the same number, 4. Each of the 2 parts you count also splits into 4 smaller parts, so you now count 8 small parts and the amount stays the same.

    2ร—4=82 \times 4 = 8
  3. Write the new fraction. You multiplied the numerator and the denominator by the same counting number, so it names the same amount of the same whole.

    25=2ร—45ร—4=820\frac{2}{5} = \frac{2 \times 4}{5 \times 4} = \frac{8}{20}

Answer

The fraction 820\frac{8}{20} is equivalent to 25\frac{2}{5} and has a denominator of 2020.

Worked example

Decide whether fractions are equivalent

Each fraction here describes part of the same whole. Is 1015\frac{10}{15} equivalent to 23\frac{2}{3}? Is 89\frac{8}{9} equivalent to 23\frac{2}{3}?

  1. Start with the first question. Rewrite two thirds with the denominator 15, so that both fractions use parts of the same size. The counting number that turns 3 into 15 is 5, because 3 times 5 is 15.

    3ร—5=153 \times 5 = 15
  2. Multiply the numerator and the denominator of two thirds by 5. This cuts each third into 5 equal parts, so the amount of the whole stays the same. The result matches the first fraction exactly.

    23=2ร—53ร—5=1015\frac{2}{3} = \frac{2 \times 5}{3 \times 5} = \frac{10}{15}
  3. Now the second question. Rewrite two thirds with the denominator 9. Multiply the denominator by 3, because 3 times 3 is 9, and multiply the numerator by 3 as well, so the amount stays the same.

    23=2ร—33ร—3=69\frac{2}{3} = \frac{2 \times 3}{3 \times 3} = \frac{6}{9}
  4. Compare this result with the second fraction. Both fractions count ninths, the parts you get when you cut the same whole into 9 equal parts, so the parts are the same size. Two thirds is 6 of those parts, but the second fraction is 8 of them. Different counts of same-size parts are different amounts.

    69โ‰ 89\frac{6}{9} \neq \frac{8}{9}

Answer

The fraction 1015\frac{10}{15} is equivalent to 23\frac{2}{3}. The fraction 89\frac{8}{9} is not, because 23\frac{2}{3} of the whole is 66 ninths, not 88 ninths.

Since one amount has many fraction names, it helps to agree on the simplest one. A fraction is in lowest terms when 11 is the only counting number that divides both its numerator and its denominator exactly.

Three ideas make this easier to say:

  • A factor of a number is a counting number that divides it exactly, with no remainder. The factors of 88 are 11, 22, 44 and 88.
  • A common factor of two numbers is a factor of both.
  • The greatest common factor (GCF) is the largest common factor.

So a fraction is in lowest terms when the GCF of its numerator and denominator is 11. For example, 712\frac{7}{12} is in lowest terms, because the only common factor of 77 and 1212 is 11. But 68\frac{6}{8} is not, because 22 divides both 66 and 88 exactly.

To write a fraction in lowest terms, divide its numerator and its denominator by their GCF.

Why can you do this? It runs the multiplying rule backwards. Take 68\frac{6}{8}. The common factors of 66 and 88 are 11 and 22, so the GCF is 22. Because 6=3ร—26 = 3 \times 2 and 8=4ร—28 = 4 \times 2, dividing both numbers by 22 undoes a multiplication of both by 22:

68=6รท28รท2=34\frac{6}{8} = \frac{6 \div 2}{8 \div 2} = \frac{3}{4}

In terms of parts, every 22 of the 88 equal parts of the whole join into 11 larger part, so 66 of 88 small parts become 33 of 44 larger equal parts. The new fraction names the same amount of the same whole. The only common factor of 33 and 44 is 11, so 34\frac{3}{4} is in lowest terms.

Why the greatest common factor? It finishes the job in one step. If the new numbers still shared a factor greater than 11, you could have divided by an even larger common factor, so the one you used would not have been the greatest.

The table shows the same steps for three more fractions.

Each row divides both numbers by their GCF, so the new fraction names the same amount of the same whole.
FractionCommon factorsDivide both numbers by the GCFLowest terms
2025\frac{20}{25}
11 and 55, so the GCF is 55
20รท525รท5\frac{20 \div 5}{25 \div 5}
45\frac{4}{5}
1624\frac{16}{24}
11, 22, 44 and 88, so the GCF is 88
16รท824รท8\frac{16 \div 8}{24 \div 8}
23\frac{2}{3}
49\frac{4}{9}
11 only, so the GCF is 11
Dividing by 11 changes nothing
49\frac{4}{9}, already in lowest terms

Worked example

Write a fraction in lowest terms

Write 3660\frac{36}{60} in lowest terms.

  1. List the factors of the numerator and of the denominator, so you can find the ones they share. The factors of 36 are 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 36. The factors of 60 are 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 10, 12, 15, 20, 30 and 60.

  2. Pick out the numbers that appear in both lists. The common factors are 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 and 12, so the greatest common factor is 12. Writing each number as a multiplication by 12 confirms that 12 divides both.

    36=3ร—1260=5ร—1236 = 3 \times 12 \qquad 60 = 5 \times 12
  3. Divide the numerator and the denominator by 12. This undoes a multiplication of both 3 and 5 by 12: every 12 of the 60 equal parts of the whole join into 1 larger part. So the new fraction names the same amount of the same whole.

    3660=36รท1260รท12=35\frac{36}{60} = \frac{36 \div 12}{60 \div 12} = \frac{3}{5}
  4. Check the result. The factors of 3 are 1 and 3, and the factors of 5 are 1 and 5. The only common factor is 1, so the fraction is in lowest terms.

  5. If you do not spot 12, divide by smaller common factors one at a time. Dividing both numbers by 2 gives 18 and 30. Dividing both by 2 again gives 9 and 15. Dividing both by 3 gives 3 and 5. Each division keeps the amount the same. Keep going until 1 is the only common factor: stopping at 18 and 30, or at 9 and 15, would be too early.

    3660=1830=915=35\frac{36}{60} = \frac{18}{30} = \frac{9}{15} = \frac{3}{5}

Answer

In lowest terms, 3660\frac{36}{60} is 35\frac{3}{5}.

Here is the idea to keep: a fraction's numbers can change while its amount stays the same. When you multiply the numerator and the denominator by the same counting number, or divide both by a common factor, you get an equivalent fraction, a new name for the same amount of the same whole. Dividing by the greatest common factor gives the name in lowest terms, where 11 is the only common factor left.

Next, you will use equivalent fractions to give fractions the same denominator, so that you can compare and order them.