Chapter 4 ยท Rational and irrational numbers
Why the Square Root of 2 Is Irrational
Learn why no fraction of integers has a square of exactly two. The square root of two is irrational, so its decimal form neither stops nor repeats.
You already know that the equation has two solutions, and , because is positive. The symbol names the positive one: the positive number whose square is exactly .
Some square roots are whole numbers, such as . But is not. Among nonnegative numbers (zero and the positive numbers), a larger number has a larger square. Since is less than and is more than , the number lies between and .
So here is the question for this lesson: is there a fraction between and whose square is exactly ?
To answer that question, you need two terms.
A rational number is a number that you can write as a fraction , where and are integers (the numbers ) and is not zero. This lesson calls such a fraction a fraction of integers. In decimal form, every rational number either terminates (its digits stop) or repeats (one block of digits repeats forever).
An irrational number is a number on the number line that is not rational. No fraction of integers equals it, and its decimal form neither terminates nor repeats.
The table shows some rational numbers. Notice that is one of them.
| Fraction of integers | Decimal form | Terminates or repeats? |
|---|---|---|
Terminates | ||
Terminates | ||
Terminates | ||
Repeats: the repeats forever | ||
Repeats: the block repeats forever |
Worked example
Test one fraction
Is the fraction equal to ?
Decide what to check. The square root of 2 is the positive number whose square is 2. This fraction is positive, so it equals the square root of 2 exactly when its square equals 2.
Square the fraction. To multiply two fractions, multiply the numerators together and multiply the denominators together.
Write 2 as a fraction with the denominator 25 so that the two numbers are easy to compare. Multiplying the numerator and the denominator by the same nonzero number, 25, does not change the value.
Compare the numerators, because the denominators match. 49 is not 50, so the square of the fraction is not 2. It falls short of 2 by one twenty-fifth.
Answer
No. is not equal to , because its square is , which is less than . The fraction is only close to .
Squaring worked as a test for , and it works for any fraction. Let and be positive integers, and suppose .
- Square both sides. Equal numbers have equal squares, squaring a fraction squares its numerator and its denominator, and . So .
- Multiply both sides by . This keeps the two sides equal, and is a positive integer because is not zero. You get .
So can equal only if : the square of the numerator must be exactly double the square of the denominator. Call this the integer test. For , it asks whether equals .
You cannot test every fraction one at a time, because there are infinitely many. You need a reason that covers them all. Even and odd numbers give you one.
An even integer is times an integer, such as . An odd integer is more than an even integer, such as . No integer is both, so an odd number is never equal to an even number.
Here is the fact you need: an odd integer always has an odd square. To see why, multiply two odd integers and write the first one as an even number plus . Multiply each part of that sum by the second odd integer:
.
The first part is even, because an even number times an integer is still times an integer. An even number plus an odd number is odd. So an odd integer times an odd integer is odd. For example, , and are all odd.
Worked example
A fraction with an odd numerator
The fraction is close to . Can it be exactly equal to ?
Use the integer test. The numerator 17 and the denominator 12 are positive integers, so the fraction can equal the square root of 2 only if the square of 17 is exactly double the square of 12.
Look at the left side. 17 is odd, and an odd integer always has an odd square, so the left side is odd.
Look at the right side. It is 2 times an integer, so it is even.
Compare. An odd number is never equal to an even number, so the two sides cannot be equal. Working out both sides confirms it: one is 289 and the other is 288.
Answer
No. is not equal to , because is odd and is even. The same reasoning rules out every fraction of positive integers with an odd numerator.
Worked example
An even numerator and an odd denominator
Can the fraction be exactly equal to ?
Use the integer test again. The numerator 10 and the denominator 7 are positive integers, so the fraction can equal the square root of 2 only if the square of 10 is exactly double the square of 7.
Look at the left side. 10 is even, so write it as 2 times 5. Multiplication can be done in any order, so put the two 2s together. The square is then 4 times an integer, and a number like that is called a multiple of 4.
Look at the right side. 7 is odd, so its square, 49, is odd. Twice an odd number is never a multiple of 4: if it were, half of it would be even, but half of it is the odd number. Dividing 98 by 4 confirms this, because it leaves a remainder of 2.
Compare. A multiple of 4 is never equal to a number that is not a multiple of 4, so the two sides cannot be equal.
Answer
No. is not equal to , because is a multiple of and is not. The same reasoning rules out every fraction of positive integers with an even numerator and an odd denominator.
| Kind of fraction | What you find | Example |
|---|---|---|
is odd | is odd, but is even. They cannot be equal. | : , |
is even and is odd | for an integer , so is a multiple of . is twice an odd number, so it is not. | : , |
and are both even | Divide both by ; the value stays the same. Repeat until one is odd, then use a row above. | , and is odd: first row |
Now put the pieces together. Take any fraction of positive integers. If the numerator and the denominator are both even, divide both by . Dividing both by the same nonzero number does not change the fraction's value. Repeat until at least one of them is odd. That must happen, because positive integers cannot keep getting smaller forever.
The fraction is now in the first or second row of the table, so it fails the integer test and is not equal to . The fraction you started with has the same value, so it is not equal to either.
So no fraction of positive integers equals . Since is positive, you could write any fraction of integers equal to it with a positive numerator and a positive denominator (if both were negative, multiply both by , which keeps the value). That means no fraction of integers at all equals .
Key concept
The square root of 2 is irrational
is the positive number whose square is exactly , and it is irrational: you cannot write it as for any integers and with . A fraction of positive integers could equal only if , and even-and-odd reasoning shows that this never happens.
Because is irrational, its decimal form neither terminates nor repeats. Any terminating decimal or fraction of integers that you write for it is an approximation (close, but not exact), so mark it with . For the exact value, write .
Takeaway. No fraction of integers has a square of exactly , so is irrational, and its decimal form neither terminates nor repeats. A value such as is only an approximation, so write , and write itself when you need the exact value. This is a fact about , not about every square root: is rational.
Next, you will estimate square roots and cube roots, and you will find and correct errors in working with roots.